Engineering and Governance Principles¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Reference | ADR-001 |
| Type | ADR |
| Version | 1.00 |
| Status | Approved |
| Owner | Technical Lead |
| Approver | Board |
| Approval Record | |
| Effective Date | 2026-08-05 |
| Next Review | 2027-08-05 |
| Review Requirements | As defined in STD-001 |
| Classification | Internal |
Purpose¶
This Architecture Decision Record documents the engineering and governance principles that guide the design, implementation and maintenance of BRSA's governance framework, technical systems and documentation.
These principles provide a consistent basis for future architectural, governance and operational decisions.
Scope¶
This ADR applies to all governance documentation, technical documentation, infrastructure, automation and software maintained on behalf of BRSA.
Context¶
BRSA is a volunteer-led organisation where continuity, transparency and maintainability are fundamental to its long-term success.
As committee members and volunteers change over time, knowledge must be retained and transferable.
Engineering and governance decisions should favour simplicity, consistency and proportionate documentation that supports effective operation without creating unnecessary administrative burden.
Decision¶
BRSA adopts the following engineering and governance principles.
Pragmatic Governance¶
Governance and documentation shall be proportionate to the needs of the organisation.
Every controlled document shall justify its maintenance by supporting one or more of:
- Governance
- Organisational continuity
- Legal or regulatory compliance
- Operational efficiency
Documents that do not provide ongoing value should not be created or retained.
Simple, Repeatable, Transferable¶
Processes and documentation should be:
- Simple enough to understand.
- Repeatable enough to follow.
- Transferable enough that another competent person can assume responsibility.
The organisation should avoid unnecessary complexity.
Convention Over Choice¶
Where multiple approaches are equally valid, BRSA will choose one documented approach.
Reducing unnecessary choices improves consistency and reduces future effort.
Document for the Next Person¶
Documentation should be written for the person who will maintain it in the future.
Documents should capture:
- Decisions
- Intent
- Ownership
- Repeatable actions
- Important dependencies
Documents should not contain unnecessary detail.
Source and Generated Content Separation¶
Markdown source documents are the authoritative version.
Generated outputs shall not become independent editable sources.
Git as the Source of Truth¶
Git repositories provide the authoritative history for controlled documents.
Git provides:
- Change history
- Traceability
- Accountability
- Recovery
Approval is Separate from Creation¶
Document authorship and document approval are distinct responsibilities.
Approval evidence shall be recorded independently of authorship.
Preserve History¶
Documents with historical value should be superseded or archived rather than deleted.
Historical information forms part of the organisation's knowledge.
Make the Right Thing Easy¶
Where a process is important, BRSA should:
- Provide templates.
- Reduce unnecessary decisions.
- Automate repetitive activities where practical.
The preferred approach should also be the easiest approach to follow.
Consequences¶
Positive¶
- Consistent governance.
- Easier volunteer handover.
- Reduced dependency on individuals.
- Improved traceability.
- Lower long-term maintenance effort.
Trade-offs¶
- Initial effort is required to establish conventions.
- Contributors are expected to follow agreed standards.
- Some flexibility is intentionally reduced.
Related Documents¶
- STD-001 Document Standard
- TMP-001 Document Template
- REG-001 Document Register
Review Requirements¶
As defined in STD-001.
Change History¶
| Version | Date | Author | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 2026-07-08 | DJC | Initial draft |
| 0.20 | 2026-07-15 | DJC | Governance principles expanded and consolidated. |
| 0.50 | 2026-07-24 | DC | Version -> 0.50; Status -> Review |
| 0.50 | 2026-08-05 | DC | Status -> Approved; Effective Date -> 2026-08-05; Last Reviewed -> 2026-08-05; Next Review -> 2027-08-05 |
| 1.00 | 2026-08-05 | DC | Version -> 1.00; Status -> Approved; Effective Date -> 2026-08-05; Last Reviewed -> 2026-08-05; Next Review -> 2027-08-05 |